AIHOT 于 2026-08-17 收录了“HarnessEval-W:将智能体化评估引入世界模型基准测试”这一公开动态。以下先呈现从来源页面抓取的正文,再给出 AIHOT 摘要与 TopoReduce 编辑解读。
PUBLIC SOURCE CONTENT
已抓取公开正文公开原文内容
[2608.16859] HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds
Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
arXiv:2608.16859 (cs)
-
[Submitted on 17 Aug 2026]
Title:HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds
Authors:Weiliang Chen, Haowen Sun, Jun Gao, Jiawei Chi, Hanyang Wang, Qiyu Dai, Yihao Li, Hao Li, Jingnan Gao, Yi-Hsin Hung, Xingzhuo Guo, Shangchen Miao, Zhiyuan Shi, Xiang Li, Fengrui Tian, Weihua Du, Ziqi Huang, Shenyuan Gao, Siqiao Huang, Mingyu Liu, Yifei Li, Shizun Wang, Xi Wang, Tianqi Zhang, Xue Luo, Xiyin Ren, Jinshan Ren, Xiaoyang Shen, Xiaobo Hu, Zhiyang Dou, Mingyu Ding, Yichao Yan, Xinchao Wang, Yizhou Wang, Shilong Liu, Wenzhao Zheng, Yueqi Duan, Yuan Gong, Ziwei Liu, Ming-Yu Liu, Jialong Wu, Jiangran Lyu, Fangfu Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds, by Weiliang Chen and 42 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A benchmark should deliver more than a scalar score: what makes an evaluation trustworthy is the reasoning that justifies the score. This is especially critical for world models, where judging a rollout requires understanding whether physics, causality, and world state evolve correctly. Humans spot such violations naturally, yet no existing benchmark automates this capability: metrics are computed brute-force, leaving no reasoning chain that can be examined or verified. We introduce HarnessEval-W, an agentified evaluation pipeline that brings the harness paradigm from the LLM ecosystem to world model benchmarking. Rather than applying a fixed rubric, HarnessEval-W interprets the context of each evaluation case, decomposes the evaluation question into measurable subproblems, and spawns specialized sub-agents, each equipped with tailored context and diagnostic tools to reason over its own subproblem. The parent agent then validates the gathered evidence and summarizes it into the final verdict. This hierarchical workflow turns every evaluation into a transparent evidence tree whose complete reasoning chain justifies the result. We apply HarnessEval-W to 18 representative world models over 330 evaluation cases. Its judgments closely align with human preferences while providing verifiable, fine-grained diagnoses of every generated rollout. We open-source the full pipeline as a live benchmark and invite the broad community to contribute to grow new skills and evaluation cases as world models evolve.
Comments:
Project Page: this https URL
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as:
arXiv:2608.16859 [cs.CV]
(or
arXiv:2608.16859v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16859
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Haowen Sun [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:43:24 UTC (8,291 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds, by Weiliang Chen and 42 other authors
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev
|
next >
new
|
recent
| 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
- NASA ADS
- Google Scholar
- Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
- Author
- Venue
- Institution
- Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
arXiv:2608.16859 (cs)
-
[Submitted on 17 Aug 2026]
Title:HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds
Authors:Weiliang Chen, Haowen Sun, Jun Gao, Jiawei Chi, Hanyang Wang, Qiyu Dai, Yihao Li, Hao Li, Jingnan Gao, Yi-Hsin Hung, Xingzhuo Guo, Shangchen Miao, Zhiyuan Shi, Xiang Li, Fengrui Tian, Weihua Du, Ziqi Huang, Shenyuan Gao, Siqiao Huang, Mingyu Liu, Yifei Li, Shizun Wang, Xi Wang, Tianqi Zhang, Xue Luo, Xiyin Ren, Jinshan Ren, Xiaoyang Shen, Xiaobo Hu, Zhiyang Dou, Mingyu Ding, Yichao Yan, Xinchao Wang, Yizhou Wang, Shilong Liu, Wenzhao Zheng, Yueqi Duan, Yuan Gong, Ziwei Liu, Ming-Yu Liu, Jialong Wu, Jiangran Lyu, Fangfu Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds, by Weiliang Chen and 42 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A benchmark should deliver more than a scalar score: what makes an evaluation trustworthy is the reasoning that justifies the score. This is especially critical for world models, where judging a rollout requires understanding whether physics, causality, and world state evolve correctly. Humans spot such violations naturally, yet no existing benchmark automates this capability: metrics are computed brute-force, leaving no reasoning chain that can be examined or verified. We introduce HarnessEval-W, an agentified evaluation pipeline that brings the harness paradigm from the LLM ecosystem to world model benchmarking. Rather than applying a fixed rubric, HarnessEval-W interprets the context of each evaluation case, decomposes the evaluation question into measurable subproblems, and spawns specialized sub-agents, each equipped with tailored context and diagnostic tools to reason over its own subproblem. The parent agent then validates the gathered evidence and summarizes it into the final verdict. This hierarchical workflow turns every evaluation into a transparent evidence tree whose complete reasoning chain justifies the result. We apply HarnessEval-W to 18 representative world models over 330 evaluation cases. Its judgments closely align with human preferences while providing verifiable, fine-grained diagnoses of every generated rollout. We open-source the full pipeline as a live benchmark and invite the broad community to contribute to grow new skills and evaluation cases as world models evolve.
Comments:
Project Page: this https URL
Subjects:
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as:
arXiv:2608.16859 [cs.CV]
(or
arXiv:2608.16859v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16859
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Haowen Sun [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:43:24 UTC (8,291 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled HarnessEval-W: Agentifying the Evaluation of Visual Worlds, by Weiliang Chen and 42 other authors
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev
|
next >
new
|
recent
| 2026-08
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
- NASA ADS
- Google Scholar
- Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
- Author
- Venue
- Institution
- Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
AIHOT 摘要
HarnessEval-W 提出一种智能体化评估流水线,将 LLM 生态中的 harness 范式引入世界模型基准测试。该方法将评估问题分解为可测量的子问题,并派生子智能体进行推理,最终由父智能体验证证据并给出结论,形成可核查的推理链。研究在 330 个评估案例上对 18 个代表性世界模型进行了测试,判断与人类偏好高度一致,并提供细粒度诊断;完整流水线已开源。
为什么值得关注
评价从打一个分数变成展示可验证的证据树,世界模型开发者能据此定位生成失败的具体子问题,而不是只得到总分。
工程化解读
从 TopoReduce 的工程视角看,这条信息属于“论文与研究”主题。它的价值不只在于一个新产品或新观点本身,还在于说明 AI 系统正在如何影响模型接入、智能体协作、研发流程、基础设施和团队决策。实际采用前,应结合原文确认版本、适用范围、价格和运行条件。
- 发布时间:2026-08-17;AIHOT 分类:论文与研究。
- AIHOT 标签:
- AIHOT 判断:评价从打一个分数变成展示可验证的证据树,世界模型开发者能据此定位生成失败的具体子问题,而不是只得到总分。
- AIHOT 评分:53;评分用于站内排序,不等同于独立评测结论。
TopoReduce 编辑观察
当 AI 动态进入真实生产环境,团队需要同时关注能力边界、数据来源、调用成本、权限控制和可回滚性。把单条新闻放回完整工程链路中阅读,比只看标题更有助于判断它是否适合自己的产品和工作流。